Jackson Falconer
BRADENTON – Establishing a 14.5 acre conservation district in the downtown-area Point Pleasant neighborhood took a step forward at
Wednesday's Bradenton City Council meeting, when council members unanimously approved moving an ordinance for such a district to a second public hearing.
The idea–to place restrictions on what the neighborhood's properties could be used for, as well as making specifications on architectural styles, setbacks and a variety of other stipulations–was favored by several residents who were in attendance for the meeting. Those residents say they are concerned about the continued alteration of their neighborhood's property makeup and character.
In particular, many have expressed concerns about Westminster Communities purchasing residents' properties. The company, which has a highly visible low-rise retirement community just outside the neighborhood, has moved to purchase a property from one owner in the neighborhood, and has approached another owner to indicate interest.
Another concern brought up was the issue of lax setback restrictions for the neighborhood's properties. One neighborhood resident, Jane Plitt, said that unless the council takes action, the form-based planning code that the neighborhood is currently under would allow for the building of more structures with little to no setbacks, one of which was recently constructed in the neighborhood.
The majority of the neighbors speaking during the meeting were in favor of the move. Two residential owners who weren't in favor of their own properties being put under the ordinance's code were able to opt out from the proposed change.
During the public hearing on the item, concerns were raised about the possibility of some property owners in the neighborhood still not having knowledge of the changes, and thus being unable to opt out before the ordinance potentially passes.
While the city had put out an advertised notice of Wednesday's hearing prior to it occurring, and a town hall had taken place between area residents in November, questions and ideas were still raised about how to ensure such a complication would not be created.
Community activist Glen Gibellina suggested sending certified notices to residents via mail to ensure all were aware of the ordinance. When asked, city attorney Bill Lisch said that the council does have the option of starting over with the process if more residents come forward requesting to not be included under the proposed code.
During discussion, council member Pat Roff said, "What we're trying to do is preserve a part of this city that warrants preservation." He later added that the idea behind the ordinance was not a new request, and had been brought to the city's attention more than once prior.
Speaking after the meeting, Roff said that the neighborhood should have never been put under form-based code to begin with, and that establishing the conservation district was a move to fix that.
The second public hearing is set for the council's next meeting, which is scheduled for Wednesday, February 10, at 8:30 a.m.
Comments
No comments on this item
Only paid subscribers can comment
Please log in to comment by clicking here.