Report Inappropriate Comments

Although it won’t be in writing, there is no way Knapp goes out on a limb without the approval of Depol and Bishop. The butt-kissing tone of Knapp’s emailed responses to Beruff confirm she has no qualms about violating the clear, unambiguous language of the LDC. I’m far from an expert, but looking at the LDC’s section 311, Table 3-1 has a footnote #6 in the Code Interpretations row that refers to Part X Section 370 - which says “Code Interpretations” by a Director can be appealed to the BoCC by “any aggrieved person.” If “aggrieved” means pissed off, then all informed citizens qualify. If aggrieved means financially damaged, all taxpayers qualify because we are subsidizing Homestead exemptions for a multi-millionaire on lots #2 and #3 on this previously subdivided property. The whole thing stinks of greed by Beruff and corruption in our county government. Bishop is out-Hopes-ing Hopes. Beruff has made millions raping our environment, but has carved a large, rare piece of beautiful land for himself and wants to avoid paying his share of taxes to the government that has allowed him to destroy the rest of the County. Register now. Vote out KVO, Satcher and Turner this year