As climate-fueled disasters escalate, insurers are getting richer while leaving Americans in the lurch. Citing climate-related losses, many insurance companies are exorbitantly inflating rates, refusing to renew policies, and delaying, denying, or underpaying claims.
The latest of many examples is Los Angeles, where wildfires devoured over 40,000 acres and left thousands unhoused and unemployed.
Many families were dropped by their insurers or struggled to find affordable options before the fires. Some turned to the state’s coverage plan, which costs more and covers less. But despite years of profitability
It’s a story Americans in other parts of the country know all too well.
After Hurricanes Laura and Ida
Following Hurricane Ian in 2022, Floridians’ payouts were drastically reduced from what insurers initially promised. Six months later, tens of thousands of claims were still open. And two years later, 25 percent had been closed without payment.
In Hawaii, insurance companies held up the 2023 Lahaina wildfire settlement for a year and a half before providing compensation.
These issues aren’t exclusive to coastal or wildfire-prone states. Homeowners in Iowa, for example, struggled for two years to resolve insurance claims following a destructive 2020 derecho.
Delays and underpayments can result in significant financial hardship and emotional strain. Families face out-of-pocket expenses for temporary housing, repairs, and secondary damage (like mold growth). These can increase debt and lower credit scores, ultimately making mortgage and other routine obligations more difficult or even impossible to meet.
Raising premiums likewise exacerbates burdens on both homeowners and renters
The insurance industry isn’t just stiffing homeowners with claim denials and rate hikes. It’s also financing the driving force behind these disasters themselves.
By continuing to underwrite and invest billions of dollars in fossil fuel projects — knowing full well that growing climate risks are making homes uninsurable — insurers actively contribute to the disasters they later refuse to cover.
Insurers market themselves as “good neighbors” or assure homeowners they’re “in good hands.” But they accumulate wealth and pay dividends to shareholders with money generated by the premiums paid by working people — who don’t get a refund when there aren’t disasters.
This is a feature, not a bug. The system is working as designed by and for the industry.
Our elected officials let this crisis fester by failing to hold insurers accountable. The industry’s model of profiting in good times and walking away in bad cannot stand. Insurance should be a safeguard for families, not a gamble where the house always wins.
At a minimum, this means: enforcing and assisting homeowners in fair, fast claims handling; stopping extreme premium hikes, especially after disasters; and preventing companies from holding states hostage or fleeing the market following a disaster.
It also means phasing out and blocking the expansion of investments in fossil fuels; requiring investments in (and premium discounts for) climate mitigation to protect our housing stock, especially affordable housing (which includes affordable insurance).
Finally, it means exploring a national disaster insurance backstop to stabilize coverage — and rejecting attempts to force working people to bail out insurers.
Policymakers have a choice: continue prioritizing corporate profits over people — or finally stand up for homeowners who have played by the rules, paid their premiums, and somehow still ended up holding the bag.
2 comments on this item
Only paid subscribers can comment
Please log in to comment by clicking here.
rayfusco68
The concept of insurance was originally started as a not for profit shared risk concept by the English ship owners. They knew that a percentage of their ships would be lost at sea but they didn't know whose ships would be lost so they created a pool of funds to help cover this risk. We should remove the profiteering element from today's home owner insurance using the actuaries to calculate risk assessment and charge rates accordingly. The system can be voluntary or mandatory depending on the will of the people. If it is voluntary and you choose not to participate then the risk is all yours. By cutting out the profiteering the rates should be more affordable based on the level of coverage you opt for. This type of risk assessment already exists in the current for profit industry.
Sunday, March 9, 2025 Report this
hawkharbor
If there is disagreement between property owner and insurance company. If not settled in 6 months then insurance company must enter in to contact with fully licensed contractors to fix and repair at no cost to homeowners
They win by delay, delay , delay and now our legislators have made attorneys fees a one way ticket to benefit the insurance industry
Sunday, March 9, 2025 Report this